In reply to:
and that is where we are different...i don't believe in giving props to a webhosting provider <period>
Word-of-mouth isn't exactly a new form of advertising for any type of business.
In reply to:
DH has DOCUMENTED issues right now
I get that you and others have had problems here. A lot of people have, including me. Same can be said for any host, including the expensive ones.
In reply to:
managing a handful of clients, my team has over 400 (only 20 with DH) and we have been on the wrong end of several of these downtime issues...
Unless 395 clients are non-paying friends/family, I don't see why you even need an account here if it's so bad.
It's odd that it's okay for you to take money from people and put them here, but you have a problem with promo codes?
Have you linked all 20 of your clients to your posts here, or is honesty only important when it comes to promo codes?
In reply to:
the only reason why i come in here to preach a "counterpoint" is that I want to show possible new DH clients that all is not as rosy as some will have you believe. Just as it is your right to promote and make things rosy about DH...
I still don't see how harassing the owners and whining about whatever passes for making a counter-point.
A lot of people come here and post their problems in ways that never get attacked by anyone. No one calls them whiners, either.
In reply to:
Actually that is incorrect....I respect those that do not get into the whole "promo code" thing...you know where those folks are coming from...
Do you? How do you know they're not top-secret undercover DH employees? PM spammers? Maybe the ones without promo codes here are making a killing from them every day with PPC. Or what about people that don't have promo codes, but have a link to their blog/site... which might have a promo code on it?
What exactly is it about your posts that you think has earned you any credibility? Lack of promo codes?
At some point, the post has to matter more than the sig beneath it... which is why I questioned you on contributing instead of whining.
(By the way... when the promo codes were making people here cry, I was fine with the idea of banning sigs completely, to avoid there being any reason to post other than adding to the discussion.)
In reply to:
...and I really believe that is bad business in general.
That's nothing more than a reason for you to not use them.
In reply to:
<If you're referring to the way of making $__ on every referral, even with the $97 code...>
that may be the case with you, but, it is not "always" the case.....
Some people rape farm animals, but I don't remember telling anyone to skip over your posts just because I don't know for a fact that you haven't done it.
In reply to:
ahh, no, i am protecting peeps from "rosy coloured glasses" that some of you seem to have permanently affixed to their aural cavities.
Whining isn't protecting. Include this with every post and see how seriously people take you: ".... By the way, I've been here 6 years and have no intention of leaving."
If someone signs up, with or without a code, and hates it--they get their money back. If a code was used, the person loses their referral. Okay, no difference there either way.
If they sign up and decide to stay based on their own 97 day evaluation, there is no benefit to not using a code. They save $97 on something they decide they want, regardless of what they read here.
Like I said before, I've only seen one refund--and that was before all of the recent problems.
I still haven't seen you discredit any posts based on their content. The only ammo you seem to have is, "He can't be right! He has a promo code in his sig!"
In reply to:
above all else, this is where i come to vent, because as you know it is impossible to speak to anyone via the telephone....
Learn how to complain faster and see what you can squeeze in on a call-back. ;) Or take lessons from this guy.
I never even said people shouldn't vent here. Just that some people need to actually contribute something once in a while, rather than do nothing but vent/whine.
I'd rather read 10 whiny posts from someone with 90 useful posts than read 1 whiny post from a person whose post count is 2.
In reply to:
<Like I've said before, this is a forum for DH'ers to help each other. How exactly does the crap you and a few others post qualify as helpful?>
How does your promo sig "help" anyone? and how come you simply write off anyone who has not had such a rosy experience with DH? My "help" is injecting some "reality" into an otherwise promo laden forum
Ask the people that have saved $97 if they found my sig helpful. Some people even read the posts (that's the part above the sig) and find those useful, too. Besides, most of the posts I reply to are from people that already host here and have a question or problem.
I don't dismiss anyone with problems. I wouldn't mind a whole section for complaints. It would clean the trash out of the other forums. If a post gets a harsh reply from me, it's generally not the content, but the way it's presented.
Someone asking for help via a tantrum is like using ebonics during a job interview. You either want to be taken seriously or you don't.
In reply to:
<The sad thing is that you know you'd be banned by any other host...>
Why would i be banned? for speaking my mind? for injecting some reality in here? banned for staying with a budget host through thick and thin? banned for wanting DH to return to quality?
Sarcastic, but I'd actually accept it as a correct answer. Maybe throw in extra points for the hippy treehugger cracks in other threads.
Many/most, if not all hosts, see any site they own as an advertisement that they're paying for. I can't think of a single host that is as lenient as DH in this area.
DH has their problems, but the main reason there are so many complaints here is because they don't get deleted.
In reply to:
I am sorry to hear that I have rained on your parade of goodwill...if only i was in the same place as you are from your perspective...
I'd still help the happy ones, even if my server was having problems. That's what I mean when I say that's what the forum is for.
Even this guy seems to know that this forum isn't the best place to whine about DH.
In reply to:
and overall downtime issues which were not being reflected in the DH reports...this cost me thousands of dollars.
I still don't buy it when people claim a single shared hosting account costs them a lot of income. Lack of redundancy and poor decision-making, maybe--but not the downtime of a single shared hosting account.
Even if it was the case, it would have put me off on shared hosting--not just DH.
It's like when people think the .snapshot directory is a reason to not keep their own backups.
In reply to:
Also, I wonder what "promo sig" you were using when you were "sooo pleasant"?? alot easier to attract bees to honey isnt it?
I thinking giving someone $97 passes for "honey."
In reply to:
You know i only went on the attack with you, after you attacked me....
Silly me. I mistook your "DH Puppet" post, which contained absolutely nothing relevant to the thread, as an attack.
In reply to:
at the time i originally signed up for DH, i was way too busy with new clients and as i stated, i did make a post here and there anonymously and i did read alot of the posts on here...i am not a troll...i want DH to get better period...
This is one of my biggest problems with the whiny posts and why they're the ones that need counter-balancing, rather than the praise posts.
When things are good, everyone's too busy to help out other forum members or praise DH. But as soon as something goes wrong, everyone has time to bash/complain/whine/etc... about DH and annoy the posters that actually use the forum for what it's for. THAT is what throws things out of balance--not helpful posts, with or without promo codes in the sigs.
In reply to:
Told you, i am satisfied with DH as a "Budget" host....i just would never place a top tier client on their service until they get things straightened out.
Unless we have different definitions of 'top tier client' -- I can't picture putting them here either--but I expand that to include any shared hosting plan.
If something is mission-critical, why put it at the mercy of hundreds of other users? Sure, your own dedicated server technically becomes a shared environment for your clients, but you get to select the people that are sharing it. If you're building sites for businesses, not many warez/porn/mp3/hack sites are going to end up on your hard drives.
It's simple. You ask yourself, "How much money will this make me?" Then you ask, "How much am I willing to spend to secure this income?" If you answer the second question with "$8/month," then I hope the answer to the first question wasn't much more than $8/month.
In reply to:
They do get to make their own business decisions, I just want them to be the best that they can be...
Do you really think your approach to that is taken seriously at all? Your approach with the owners got you a refund offer. I think when someone is willing to pay you to leave, it's their way of saying you need a new approach.
Got suggestions? Use the suggestion panel. I do. Word them in a way that will get other users' support & votes. I've even put in suggestions that were pretty much thrown right into the mix, without needing votes.
In reply to:
actually i am in the minority only in the fact that i have decided to stick it out with DH....top tier designers simply quietly move things over to more stable environments like a rackspace and you wouldnt even know it...
Who do you think made the right move? Them for moving to a place you'd rather be, or you for staying at a place they wouldn't want to be?
If you stay to use the service for whatever it's worth to you, that's fine. DH not being Rackspace isn't a reason to complain, though.
In reply to:
Yet you seem to go out of your way to battle me about this.....i have documented issues with DH stretching back to 05 - you have not....that is why we will see things differently..
I can turn it around and say that same thing. I don't have a problem with DH and you can't accept it, so you blame everything on promo codes.
In reply to:
those folks use the MarkMonitor service and it is only a matter of time before you get a letter
I have a bunch of domain names that contain DH. If they wanted them I'd happily hand them over.
I think there was a whole thread on this topic, or at least a thread that went off-course and became this topic. They don't seem to go after the name unless it violates their wordmark by competing against them.
Sites that promote DH and state the relationship, if any, aren't hurting DH. Same goes for the other extreme, the "DH Sucks" sites. On the other hand, it would be a bad idea to try competing by running a hosting business from a domain like BetterThanDreamhost.com. Or possibly even using something like that to promote a competitor--not sure where the line gets drawn on that one.
DH doesn't have Wal-Mart money, so until I see Wal-Mart eliminate the "Wal-mart Sucks" sites, I doubt that even the ones that use DH in a negative way have much to worry about.
Besides, they don't even delete the trash-talking here, so I doubt they put much effort into shutting people up on other domains.