> I have moved to a different primary hosting provider ... I will keep DreamHost as a secondary hosting provider for my smaller sites.
Don't want to start my own clarification thread (as noone really cares and I am yet to keep an active blog), but I must admit that I am now using 3 other hosts ALONG WITH DREAMHOST. The difference is: I still consider DreamHost as my primary host in that my most important domains are hosted with them.
But to be frank, I am SERIOUSLY weighing the pros and cons of continuing to do so. One of the reasons is the somewhat growing downtime (for both web and e-mail) over the past few months. I have been using AND RECOMMENDING DreamHost for the past 5 (yes, FIVE) years mostly for their RELIABILITY (not particular pricing). Downtime had been (yes, had, not have) near zero, and I didn't have to worry about not getting e-mail (nor delays in getting them like for more than a minute or 2) or websites not showing up. This is paricularly important because I am hosting for my clients as well.
However, things have really deteriorated quite a bit (noticeably) in the past 6 months, when I have come across more and more short spans (less than an hour mostly but then those with more than a couple of hours are getting more frequent) of downtime. I can no more brag about DreamHost bullet-proof uptime which I enjoyed soooo much before. (I charge my client a bit higher than other competitors but used to beat them on quality.) The worst thing is: I canNOT verify the uptime. The system status page on the control panel always "claims" to be fine, e.g. "Up for 11 mons 6 days" when I'm damn sure that DreamHost (not my ISP) have been down for more than a dozen of times (each more than 15 minutes) in that same time frame.
I have started another thread regarding using 3rd party monitoring like WebSitePulse (which my other hosts use and I can show to my clients), but there seems to be little interest among DreamHost staff and even other users. The bottom line is: I don't really care about 3rd party monitoring IF there's little downtime. As a matter of fact, I rarely check even the status page before, when 100% uptime is what I could take for granted.
Apart from the generous bandwidth (which is of little use to me), I hope that DreamHost can stand out AGAIN on something more solid (like uptime), esp. when she has lost sadly in areas like support response (24 hrs vs. 15 mins) and the number of domains allowed (3 - 31 vs. unlimited), the latter being the reason why I also host with 3 other companies.
Lastly, I must say thanks to Jeff who have been very helpful in numerous situations and am really glad that Dallas is taking the time to address some of the problems that users raise here.